Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's global score of 80.2. The LG Velvet is a incredibly newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note5, although it's a little heavier and a little bit thicker. LG Velvet counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has just a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a little higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The LG Velvet counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG Velvet shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture and a lot larger sensor.
LG Velvet features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.