Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's overall score of 80.2. The Motorola edge is a noticeably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note5, although it is just a bit heavier and thicker. The Motorola edge has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a little sharper screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Motorola edge counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola edge also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Motorola edge has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola edge features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.