Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge (2024)'s 78.5 overall score. Galaxy Note5's body is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Motorola Edge (2024), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy Note5 features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge (2024) features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge (2024) has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge (2024) has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2024) also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.