Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a overall score of 80.2 against 78.5. Galaxy Note5 is a just a bit heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but they are 0.3inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little sharper display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a much higher video quality, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.