Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's 80.2 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, although it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Galaxy Note5 features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little worse display density and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much larger camera aperture for better low light images and video, a camera with much more MP and a lot larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.