Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's 80.2 score. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably newer than Galaxy Note5, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a sharper screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography, a much more MP back camera and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.