Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)'s 76 overall score. Galaxy Note5's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), even though it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) captures slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.