Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note5's global score of 80.2. The Moto G200 5G is a newer device than Samsung Galaxy Note5, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 has a bit more vivid display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater display density. Moto G200 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.9 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also has a much higher resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.