Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than Motorola Moto G41, getting an 80.2 score against 79.1. Galaxy Note5's design is just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto G41, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has just a bit better processing power than Moto G41. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Moto G41 counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G41 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Moto G41 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better captures in poorly lited situations.
The Moto G41 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.