Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Moto G51 5G, getting a score of 80.2 against 77.8. Although Galaxy Note5 is notably older than Moto G51 5G, it's design is somewhat thinner and lighter. Galaxy Note5 has a little sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G51 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Moto G51 5G takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G51 5G also has higher 240 fps video frame rate, a much more megapixels camera in the back and a larger aperture.
The Moto G51 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto G51 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G51 5G has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.