Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G60s's overall score of 79.9. Samsung Galaxy Note5's construction is much thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G60s. Galaxy Note5 has a little faster processing unit than Moto G60s. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy Note5 counts with a little sharper display than Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better quantity of pixels per display inch. The Moto G60s counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Moto G60s shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also has a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
The Moto G60s has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.