Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G8 Power's 76 score. Samsung Galaxy Note5's design is lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G8 Power, although it was released 5 years before. The Galaxy Note5 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G8 Power. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better looking display than Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display pixel density. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G8 Power's camera is very similar to the Galaxy Note5 one, because although the Moto G8 Power has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same resolution camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The Moto G8 Power counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.