Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a little bit better than Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 80.2 against 78.6. The Galaxy Note5 body is lighter and much thinner than Moto G9 Power, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note5 features a brighter screen than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot better pixel density.
The Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Power. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Moto G9 Power captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video quality, the Moto G9 Power also has a much better resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light environments and better video frame rates.
Moto G9 Power has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.