Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has an overall score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Galaxy Note5 is an older phone than Motorola One Hyper, but Samsung made it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note5 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Hyper. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola One Hyper has better battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola One Hyper shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same camera aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.