Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting an 80.2 score against 80. Even though Galaxy Note5 is extremely older than Motorola One Zoom, it's body is thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a little better processing power than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola One Zoom features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Zoom counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Zoom also has a lot larger sensor, a larger aperture and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.