Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a global score of 87, which is slightly better than Galaxy Note5's 80.2 general score. The Motorola razr (2020) body is extremely newer, but a little thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Note5. The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels density. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography, a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a way better resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.