Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 515 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a general score of 80.2 against 79.2. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a way better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a quite smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note5 has a very superior processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.