Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has a score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. Galaxy Note5 is an incredibly older cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but Samsung could make it a little bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Note5, because it has a bit better count of pixels per screen inch, a quite better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a bigger screen.
The OPPO Find X2 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 40% bigger battery size. OPPO Find X2 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger aperture, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.