Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, having a global score of 80.2 against 77.7. The Galaxy Note5 has the same weight and thickness than OPPO Find X2 Neo. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a quite inferior pixels count per inch of display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a little better processing power than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features better battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.