Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a score of 80.2 against 76. Galaxy Note5's body is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than OPPO Find X3 Neo, although it was released 6 years before. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Neo has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X3 Neo takes better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has a much more mega pixels back camera, higher video frame rates and a larger aperture to take better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.