Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a score of 80.2 against 77. The Galaxy Note5 body has the same thickness than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but it's just a bit lighter. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture for better images in low light environments.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a really longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.