Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A22's 76.1 global score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note5 is noticeably older than the Galaxy A22, it's construction is a little thinner and a bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A22. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy A22 counts with a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A22 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy Note5 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality. Galaxy Note5 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.