Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's score of 80.2. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's body is a lot newer than Galaxy Note5's, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A22 5G's processing unit is just as good as Galaxy Note5's processor, both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy Note5 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A22 5G shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A22 5G has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.