Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a score of 80.2 against 79.4. Galaxy Note5 is an older device than Galaxy A35 5G, but it is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note5 features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher number of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity. Galaxy A35 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.