Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than the Galaxy Note5's global score of 80.2. The Galaxy A52 is a a lot newer phone than the Galaxy Note5, although it's a little thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 50% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations and a back-facing camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.