Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than Galaxy A70, getting a general score of 80.2 against 76.9. Samsung Galaxy Note5's body is a little lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A70, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy A70's processing unit is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although the Galaxy A70 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A70 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A70 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note5 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy Note5 also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.