Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note5, with a overall score of 84.6 against 80.2. Even though Galaxy F23 is a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, it's incredibly lighter and also a lot newer. The Galaxy F23 and Samsung Galaxy Note5 feature incredibly similar processors, they have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video and a camera in the back with a way worse resolution. The Galaxy F23 has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.