Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Galaxy Note5's 80.2 score. The Galaxy Fold construction is way newer and just a bit thinner than the Galaxy Note5's, although it is notably heavier. Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 46 percent greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a lower video quality and a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a way larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.