Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Galaxy Note5, having an 89.7 score against 80.2. Galaxy S10 Lite's design is much newer, but a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than the Galaxy Note5. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 Lite takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality, better video frame rate and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.