Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-21 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S23, with an 80.2 score against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy Note5's design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S23, but it is a lot heavier. Galaxy Note5 features a much faster CPU than Galaxy S23, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy Note5 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S23, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a little greater display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S23 has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S23 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, because it has a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a much more megapixels camera. Galaxy S23 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 30 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.