Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 5, getting a overall score of 80.2 against 78.1. The Galaxy Note5 construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note5 has a sharper display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover 5. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs in low light situations, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also counts with a much higher video resolution.
Galaxy XCover 5 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover 5 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 5's battery performance is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy Note5.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.