Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 80.2 score against 77.6. The Galaxy Note5 design is incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The Galaxy Note5 has a sharper screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. Galaxy Note5 has a way better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 35% bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note5 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 16 mega pixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.