Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 80.2 score against 80.1. Even though the Galaxy Note5 is a lot older than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note5. They have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in poorly lited environments and a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a much higher video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.