Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's 80.2 general score. Galaxy Z Flip is a extremely newer and just a bit thinner device than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, although it's also just a bit heavier. Galaxy Note5 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels in each screen inch and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.