Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's global score of 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is a lot newer and a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than Galaxy Note5. Galaxy Note5 has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel count in each display inch and a little higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy Note5 features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.