Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Galaxy Note5, having a score of 90.6 against 80.2. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is notably heavier than Galaxy Note5, it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Note5 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note5 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.