Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-08-21 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note5, having an 82.7 score against 80.2. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro design is incredibly newer than Galaxy Note5's, but it's heavier and thicker. The Galaxy Note5 has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more MP, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a bigger aperture for better low light photos.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.