Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2015-08-21 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a global score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's general score of 80.2. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a a lot newer cellphone than the Galaxy Note5, but it is a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Note5 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.