Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5, getting an 82.4 score against 80.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a way newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Note5, although it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has more RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.