Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, having a general score of 80.2 against 78.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note5 is a lot older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's body is just a little bit lighter and a little thinner. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a little worse pixels number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features as much storage to install games and applications as the Galaxy Note5 one, they have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy Note5's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has 2 GB more RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Note5 captures clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.