Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note5, with a score of 82.2 against 80.2. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 body is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note5. Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy Note5 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a back camera with a way lower 16 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.