Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note5 counts with a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note5, because it has a back facing camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.