Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note5, having a score of 83.1 against 80.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a newer and notably lighter phone than the Galaxy Note5, although it is just a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note5 has a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit worse 1220 x 2710 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note5, because it has a much larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos, a way better resolution back camera and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.