Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-08-02 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting a overall score of 93.3 against 79.5. Even though Apple iPhone 13 Pro is somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's a little bit thinner and notably newer. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher number of cores , a 64-bit processor and a higher amount of RAM memory.
IPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a just a bit lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.