Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| 2016-08-02 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note7, getting a general score of 88.1 against 79.5. Apple iPhone X's construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note7. The Apple iPhone X features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a little lower 1125 x 2436px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
IPhone X counts with a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone X counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with longer battery performance than iPhone X, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone X counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in low light environments and a tinier sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera in the back, the iPhone X also counts with higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.