Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-08-02 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy Note7, getting an 80 score against 79.5. Google Pixel 3's body has the same thickness than Galaxy Note7, but it's lighter. Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a just a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen, a little bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Google Pixel 3 also has 4 more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.