Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Although Galaxy Note7 is older and heavier than Google Pixel 3a, it's design is still just a bit thinner. Galaxy Note7 counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a little bit bigger screen and a just a little better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a also has a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel 3a shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations and a tinier back camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a camera in the back with more MP.
Galaxy Note7 has a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.