Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. The Google Pixel 4 is a incredibly newer and a bit lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it's also just a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a just a little better pixel number per inch of display.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has just a little better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy Note7 features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. Google Pixel 4 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and photos, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 also counts with a more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.