Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-08-02 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's, but it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note7, because it has a slightly better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a quite bigger screen and a quite greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a much better memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a better 12.2 MP resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.