Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. Even though Google Pixel 4a is a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's somewhat lighter and also newer. Google Pixel 4a has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a just a bit higher pixel density. The Google Pixel 4a takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a back facing camera with more megapixels.
Galaxy Note7 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Galaxy Note7 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.